Camelyon

20,400 breast lymph-node tiles, labelled tumour or normal, contributed by two medical centers (RUMC and UMCU) and scored at k = 11. Scored entirely outside TCGA, so no encoder holds an in-distribution advantage from its pretraining corpus — the cleanest of the three cohorts to read, and the most discriminating: 7 pathology encoders score below zero, meaning their typical neighbourhood is closer to a different-biology tile from the same center than to a same-biology tile from another.

Camelyon, sorted by median CRoMa. Columns are explained under Reading the columns; † marks the natural-image control (The natural-image control).

Model

bio bacc

conf bacc

RI

MaRI

CRoMa

F(0)

LTM₁₀

support

RudolfV-2-S

0.984

0.823

0.932

0.940

0.32

0.047

-0.02

58.8%

Mascaret

0.981

0.849

0.909

0.914

0.29

0.041

-0.02

72.7%

RudolfV-2

0.989

0.915

0.895

0.903

0.24

0.065

-0.04

38.3%

RudolfV-2-B

0.987

0.921

0.878

0.888

0.24

0.071

-0.05

38.3%

Virchow2

0.988

0.958

0.806

0.823

0.20

0.129

-0.11

31.4%

CONCH

0.971

0.956

0.662

0.626

0.20

0.225

-0.20

35.9%

GenBio-PathFM

0.983

0.928

0.842

0.850

0.19

0.092

-0.07

38.3%

CONCHv1.5

0.971

0.915

0.774

0.763

0.19

0.174

-0.14

46.3%

H0-mini

0.969

0.927

0.741

0.718

0.17

0.180

-0.16

38.7%

Virchow

0.980

0.946

0.751

0.708

0.16

0.221

-0.18

26.4%

Phaet

0.967

0.943

0.708

0.686

0.11

0.219

-0.18

48.4%

Midnight-12k

0.976

0.984

0.478

0.408

0.11

0.354

-0.35

19.8%

H-optimus-1

0.986

0.978

0.664

0.677

0.08

0.219

-0.14

17.2%

DINOv2-B †

0.919

0.912

0.561

0.507

0.05

0.345

-0.18

68.0%

H-optimus-0

0.982

0.966

0.659

0.652

0.05

0.315

-0.15

23.7%

UNI2-h

0.986

0.987

0.515

0.548

0.04

0.370

-0.21

13.0%

MUSK

0.958

0.983

0.366

0.297

0.04

0.403

-0.22

28.0%

mSTAR

0.979

0.984

0.460

0.434

0.02

0.418

-0.18

18.0%

Prov-GigaPath

0.979

0.991

0.375

0.369

0.01

0.470

-0.19

14.4%

UNI

0.982

0.999

0.108

0.092

-0.03

0.651

-0.22

9.6%

Hibou-B

0.973

0.999

0.057

0.041

-0.09

0.737

-0.36

13.4%

GPFM

0.955

0.999

0.034

0.017

-0.10

0.753

-0.36

20.9%

Phikon

0.955

1.000

0.009

0.004

-0.20

0.905

-0.48

16.6%

Phikon-v2

0.954

1.000

0.019

0.008

-0.21

0.932

-0.50

16.9%

Prost40M

0.926

1.000

0.015

0.002

-0.32

0.922

-0.64

27.2%

Hibou-L

0.971

1.000

0.013

0.001

-0.44

0.993

-0.66

12.1%

Read the support column carefully here. Two biological classes across two centers is a sparse neighbourhood: no encoder’s support fraction clears 73%, and the floor is 10%. A high RI over that little evidence is not the same claim as one over TCGA-4×4’s near-total support — the same two indices, resting on very different amounts of evidence.

The two rankings, on this cohort alone:

Median CRoMa against tail severity LTM₁₀ on Camelyon. Better is up and to the right; ringed points are undominated on both axes and named, and the shaded region is dominated on both. Hover or tab to any point to name it with its two values. The natural-image control is excluded — the frontier is a pathology-only claim.

The distribution explorer

The same explorer as the aggregate page’s, pinned to Camelyon. Click a row to move the detail, drag across the detail curve to count the samples in any range, and pick a second encoder under Compare with to overlay its shape.

The shape says more than the median. Virchow2 and CONCH sit within 0.002 of each other on median CRoMa — indistinguishable on that column alone — while CONCH carries 1.7× the confounder-dominant mass and 1.9× the tail severity. Overlay the two above to see it.

Shortcut susceptibility

Shortcut susceptibility for every encoder on this cohort, in domain (ID) and out of domain (OOD); the natural-image control sits last. Rows are ranked by Change at V = 1, the normalized change at maximum confounding, because nIPD averages over the whole range: an early gain there can pay for a late collapse, so a curve ending at chance can outrank one that never moved. Rows ending at or below -0.900 are marked ≈ chance, where none of the above-chance margin survives.

Bold marks the leading ranked encoder in each column where higher is better, so a column that disagrees with the ranking shows it at a glance. Each caption reports Spearman ρ, the rank correlation between the CRoMa and nIPD columns: how closely the two order the encoders the same way. Shortcut susceptibility defines the measure and holds the interactive explorer.

Camelyon — ID; Spearman ρ = 0.94; n=25 ranked pathology encoders

Model

Median CRoMa (m=5)

Change at V = 1

nIPD

Baseline balanced accuracy

RudolfV-2-S

0.324

-0.074

-0.008

0.986

Mascaret

0.285

-0.087

-0.007

0.974

RudolfV-2

0.243

-0.116

-0.020

0.991

RudolfV-2-B

0.235

-0.127

-0.020

0.988

Virchow

0.155

-0.228

-0.028

0.982

Virchow2

0.199

-0.234

-0.041

0.987

CONCHv1.5

0.187

-0.250

-0.032

0.969

H0-mini

0.167

-0.296

-0.036

0.980

GenBio-PathFM

0.191

-0.304

-0.044

0.986

CONCH

0.196

-0.367

-0.043

0.971

Phaet

0.111

-0.378

-0.064

0.971

H-optimus-1

0.082

-0.417

-0.072

0.991

Midnight-12k

0.108

-0.436

-0.075

0.978

UNI2-h

0.045

-0.446

-0.084

0.986

MUSK

0.042

-0.548

-0.087

0.964

Prov-GigaPath

0.009

-0.647

-0.121

0.981

H-optimus-0

0.045

-0.650

-0.110

0.982

mSTAR

0.022

-0.714

-0.153

0.984

GPFM

-0.104

-0.772

-0.158

0.968

Phikon

-0.196

-0.859

-0.147

0.960

UNI

-0.034

-0.884

-0.176

0.983

Hibou-B

-0.089

-0.895

-0.193

0.967

Prost40M

-0.318

-0.910 ≈ chance

-0.145

0.927

Hibou-L

-0.443

-0.949 ≈ chance

-0.183

0.958

Phikon-v2

-0.208

-0.971 ≈ chance

-0.199

0.970

DINOv2-B †

0.050

-0.730

-0.111

0.936

Camelyon — OOD; Spearman ρ = 0.74; n=25 ranked pathology encoders

Model

Median CRoMa (m=5)

Change at V = 1

nIPD

Baseline balanced accuracy

RudolfV-2

0.243

-0.002

0.001

0.996

RudolfV-2-B

0.235

-0.002

-0.000

0.996

RudolfV-2-S

0.324

-0.015

0.001

0.996

Virchow2

0.199

-0.027

-0.006

0.995

Mascaret

0.285

-0.038

-0.003

0.988

Midnight-12k

0.108

-0.042

0.002

0.975

Virchow

0.155

-0.045

0.000

0.984

H-optimus-0

0.045

-0.079

-0.008

0.983

GenBio-PathFM

0.191

-0.115

-0.012

0.994

H0-mini

0.167

-0.117

-0.007

0.986

CONCHv1.5

0.187

-0.125

-0.012

0.979

H-optimus-1

0.082

-0.163

-0.020

0.995

Prov-GigaPath

0.009

-0.202

-0.022

0.983

UNI2-h

0.045

-0.203

-0.012

0.985

Phaet

0.111

-0.207

-0.020

0.977

CONCH

0.196

-0.232

-0.018

0.983

MUSK

0.042

-0.322

-0.047

0.976

Phikon

-0.196

-0.327

-0.056

0.955

mSTAR

0.022

-0.328

-0.053

0.986

UNI

-0.034

-0.336

-0.037

0.985

Hibou-B

-0.089

-0.354

-0.091

0.964

Hibou-L

-0.443

-0.369

-0.011

0.944

GPFM

-0.104

-0.381

-0.045

0.966

Prost40M

-0.318

-0.538

-0.047

0.894

Phikon-v2

-0.208

-0.744

-0.171

0.962

DINOv2-B †

0.050

-0.759

-0.139

0.940